Standards for Continuances to Pursue Collateral Relief in Removal Proceedings (Matter of L-A-B-R-)
Validated finding · five-country-2010-20260922-v118-evidence-presentation-fix
Policy effect
The Attorney General issued a binding precedent decision establishing a multifactor legal standard governing motions for continuances under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29. The decision limits immigration judges' discretion when a respondent requests a continuance to pursue collateral relief outside immigration court, requiring the adjudicator to focus primarily on the likelihood that the collateral relief will be granted and will materially affect the outcome of the removal proceedings. Phase scope: Nationwide EOIR immigration courts and Board of Immigration Appeals proceedings
Official source excerpt
Quoted verbatim from the official source below. Ellipses indicate omitted text.
(1) An immigration judge may grant a motion for a continuance of removal proceedings only “for good cause shown.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29. (2) The good-cause standard is a substantive requirement that limits the discretion of immigration judges and prohibits them from granting continuances for any reason or no reason at all. (3) The good-cause standard requires consideration and balancing of multiple relevant factors when a respondent alien requests a continuance to pursue collateral relief from another authority—for example, a visa from the Department of Homeland Security. See Matter of Hashmi, 24 I&N Dec. 785, 790 (BIA 2009). (4) When a respondent requests a continuance to pursue collateral relief, the immigration judge must consider primarily the likelihood that the collateral relief will be granted and will materially affect the outcome of the removal proceedings.
Review method
Two separate automated exact-claim source reviews
Automated source validation is not independent human legal review. The finding should not be treated as legal advice. Record fcp5-0e83e63cc55942f801d8. Something wrong? Flag this record.
Other United States changes operative in 2018
- 2018-01-19Requirement to Articulate Particular Social Groups Before the Immigration Judge (Matter of W-Y-C- & H-O-B-)
- 2018-03-05Vacatur of Requirement for Full Evidentiary Hearings in Asylum Claims (Matter of E-F-H-L-)
- 2018-04-06Zero-Tolerance Policy for Southwest Border Offenses Under 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a)
- 2018-05-15Tenant-occupancy methodology withdrawn for EB-5 job forecasts
- 2018-05-17Matter of Castro-Tum: Restriction on General Administrative Closure Authority
- 2018-06-11Matter of A-B-, 27 I&N Dec. 316 (A.G. 2018), Interim Decision #3929
- 2018-09-11Outright Denials Without Request for Evidence (RFE) or Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) (PM-602-0163)
- 2018-09-18Limitation on Immigration Judges' Inherent Authority to Terminate or Dismiss Removal Proceedings (Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-)
- 2018-10-01Expanded Issuance of Notices to Appear (NTAs) for Denied Status-Impacting Applications
- 2018-10-04Presidential Determination on Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2019
- 2018-11-01Medical-report validity recalculated from the civil surgeon signature