← United States · 2020

witharrow.ai/volatility-index/united-states/fcp-cc826ea50e2be52efecd

USCIS Policy Manual Update: Lawful Admission Prerequisite for Naturalization

Validated finding · five-country-2010-20260922-v118-evidence-presentation-fix

CountryUnited States
Operative dateNovember 18, 2020
CategoryCitizenship & naturalization
Policy toolEligibility & removal screening
Affected groupNaturalization applicants (form n-400)

Policy effect

Instructs adjudicators to review whether an applicant was lawfully admitted to LPR status and maintained status without abandonment, and mandates denial of naturalization applications filed on or after the effective date if the applicant is in pending removal proceedings initiated by a warrant of arrest.

Conditions and exceptions

Validated condition or limit: Instructs adjudicators to review whether an applicant was lawfully admitted to LPR status and maintained status without abandonment, and mandates denial of naturalization applications filed on or after the effective date if the applicant is in pending removal proceedings initiated by a warrant of arrest.

Official source excerpt

Quoted verbatim from the official source below. Ellipses indicate omitted text.

… which the applicant was previously admitted and then ordered removed. 2. Pending Removal Proceedings Except for certain applications for naturalization based on military service,[141] USCIS lacks the authority to grant naturalization to an applicant against whom there is a pending removal proceeding initiated by a warrant of arrest.[142] An NTA is a warrant of arrest for purposes of INA 318,[143] except in the 9th Circuit.[144] Officers should consult with USCIS counsel on any INA 318 cases in the 9th Circuit involving pending removal proceedings. Effective November 18, 2020, where a removal proceeding is pending against a naturalization applicant, USCIS denies the naturalization application under INA 318 based solely on the existence of pending removal proceedings against the applicant.[145] The officer may not issue a decision based on the merits of the naturalization application.[146] Therefore, if an NTA is issued and a removal proceeding is pending against a naturalization applicant on or before the date of the decision on the naturalization application, the officer should deny the naturalization application under INA 318,[147] even if the removal proceeding was administratively … before IIRIRA, the Warrant of Arrest may be Form I-221S, which is part of the Order to Show Cause (Form I-221). [^ 145] This applies to naturalization applications filed on or after November 18, 2020 (effective date of policy). See INA 318. See De Lara Bellajaro v. Schiltgen, 378 F.3d 1042, 1043 (9th Cir. 2004), as amended (agency’s denial of applicant’s naturalization application on the ground that INA 318 precludes the application from being considered while removal proceedings are pending is “unquestionably correct”). [^ 146] See Saba-Bakare v. Chertoff, 507 F.3d 337, 340 (5th Cir. 2007) ( …
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)USCIS Policy Alert PA-2020-23 (12 USCIS-PM B.4, D.2, F.2)Open official source
Retrieved from https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-12-part-d-chapter-2

Review method

Two separate automated exact-claim source reviews

Automated source validation is not independent human legal review. The finding should not be treated as legal advice. Record fcp-cc826ea50e2be52efecd. Something wrong? Flag this record.

Other United States changes operative in 2020