← United States · 2011

witharrow.ai/volatility-index/united-states/fcp-c1720734f5b59a4a4b56

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Transitional Worker Classification

Validated finding · five-country-2010-20260922-v118-evidence-presentation-fix

CountryUnited States
Operative dateOctober 7, 2011
CategoryWork authorization
Policy toolNew pathway
Affected groupNew applicants

Policy effect

Implementation of a new visa program and transitional worker classification (CW-1) for foreign workers in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

Official source excerpt

Quoted verbatim from the official source below. Ellipses indicate omitted text.

… individual in the CNMI who had not been admitted or paroled within the meaning of section 212(a)(6)(A) would also necessarily lack “a valid entry document” for purposes of section 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I). As a result, it appears that under Minto the very people ostensibly protected from removal by Congress were not actually protected—even if they could not be removed for lack of a valid entry, under Minto they were removable for lack of a valid entry document. 1 1 Minto suggested that a visa program for CNMI workers would provide relief from section 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I). Minto, 854 F.3d at 625. But … ) does not mean that one is deemed to be “applying . . . for admission” for purposes of section 212(h), a provision contained in the same section as section 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I), the relevant ground of removal. Matter of Y-N-P-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 10, 13 (B.I.A. 2012). Before Minto, we had determined that this precedential BIA opinion is worthy of deference. Garcia-Mendez v. Lynch, of the two-year transition period and months after both Torres and Minto were ordered removed. See Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Transitional Worker Classification, 76 Fed. Reg. 55,501, 55,502 (Sept. 7, 2011 …
uscourts.govuscourts.gov. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Transitional Worker Classification.Open official source
Retrieved from https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2019/06/12/13-70653.pdf

Review method

Two separate automated exact-claim source reviews

Automated source validation is not independent human legal review. The finding should not be treated as legal advice. Record fcp-c1720734f5b59a4a4b56. Something wrong? Flag this record.