← Canada · 2015

witharrow.ai/volatility-index/canada/fcp5-ab264020595d4ede659a

Regulations Amending the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (Administrative Monetary Penalties and Ineligibility System for Employers)

Validated finding · five-country-2010-20260922-v118-evidence-presentation-fix

CountryCanada
Operative dateDecember 1, 2015
CategoryEnforcement
Policy toolSanctions
Affected groupEmployers

Policy effect

Establishes administrative monetary penalties and periods of hiring ineligibility for employers who violate temporary foreign worker compliance conditions. Phase scope: National / all employers of temporary foreign workers and non-compliant sponsor employers under IRPR

Official source excerpt

Quoted verbatim from the official source below. Ellipses indicate omitted text.

… the employer of that determination and that the information referred to in subsection 209.997(2) will be added to the list referred to in that subsection. Publication of employer’s information (6) If an officer makes a determination under subsection (5), the Department must add the information referred to in subsection 209.997(2) to the list referred to in that subsection. 7. Section 209.91 of the Regulations is repealed. 8. The Regulations are amended by adding the following after section 209.92: DIVISION 6 ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY PENALTIES AND OTHER CONSEQUENCES FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS … to the Minister under paragraph 209.11(1)(d). Purpose Purpose of Division 209.94 The purpose of this Division is to encourage compliance with the provisions of the Act and these Regulations and not to punish. Violations Violations 209.95 (1) An employer referred to in subsection 209.2(1) or 209.3(1) who fails to comply with one of the conditions set out in the provisions listed in column 1 of Table 1 of Schedule 2 — if the failure to do so is not justified under subsection 209.2(3) or (4), 209.3(3) or (4) or 209.4(2) — commits a violation and (a) is liable to an administrative monetary penalty … of an amount that is determined in accordance with section 209.98 or if it is determined under that section that there is no penalty, is issued a warning informing the employer that there is no administrative monetary penalty for the violation but that the violation will be considered in the calculation of the total number of points under subparagraph 209.991(1)(a)(i) for any subsequent violation; and (b) if applicable, is ineligible to employ a foreign national for whom a work permit is required for the period determined in accordance with section 209.99. Discrepancy (2) In the event of a discrepancy … where employers have benefitted financially from non-compliance. Description: To enhance the existing compliance framework and to be able to respond proportionately to non-compliance with TFWP/IMP conditions, Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) and Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) developed regulatory amendments to implement a system of administrative monetary penalties (AMPs). In addition, these amendments add warning statements as a possible consequence for violations and replace the existing mandatory two-year ban with periods of ineligibility to employ foreign nationals for whom a work permit is required (“bans”) of 1, 2, 5, and 10 years, as well as a permanent ban for the most serious violations. The amendments also encourage employers to voluntarily disclose non-compliance and receive reduced consequences if the voluntary disclosure is acceptable. In accordance with the principles of natural justice, under the amendments, employers will be provided the opportunity to make written submissions regarding preliminary findings of non-compliance, as well as the potential consequences, before a final determination is made. Cost-benefit statement: The total costs of …
Canada GazetteCanada Gazette, Part II, Vol. 149, No. 13 (SOR/2015-144, June 12, 2015)Open official source
Retrieved from https://gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2015/2015-07-01/html/sor-dors144-eng.html

Review method

Two separate automated exact-claim source reviews

Automated source validation is not independent human legal review. The finding should not be treated as legal advice. Record fcp5-ab264020595d4ede659a. Something wrong? Flag this record.